The gospel of Mark Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

The gospel of Mark - Essay employmentIt is a critical time in the history of the Church and the passage in Mark 71-23 must be seen against this particular historical background. There is one major theme through forbidden this passage, and that is the residue between purity and defilement, and the key motivation of savior appears to be to announce a very monumental shift from Jewish to Christian thinking. It is a transitional passage, therefore, and this can be seen in two ways. deliveryman signals a transition from the Old Covenant based on the lawfulness, to something that transcends the law, and he shifts his mission from the Jewish heartlands to the heathen territories. These two dimensions are, of course, connected. The passage in question introduces a phase of preaching and doctrine in the hedonist territories. The major difference between Jews and Gentiles is the observance of Jewish law by the Jews only. As a Jew himself, the Nazarene attracted much criticism from Je wish authorities for his liberal attitude to some of the Jewish commandments, and no uncertainness also some apprehension from the Gentiles who would need to know whether following Jesus would mean converting to Judaism with tout ensemble told that this entails. It is defecate from the text that some of the followers of Jesus observed the Jewish dietary rules, and some did not. The subject was, therefore, not clearly settled and this was a potential cause of disunity in the early Church. In fact this issue is documented again and again, as reported in Acts2 and in the letters of Paul.3 The gospel passage spells out what the Jewish laws entail, even though the disciples are already well aware of these rules. This detail is evidence that the teaching of these points is designed for Gentile listeners in the first instance, to explain what the issue is about and invite them now to plug into with the followers of Jesus on an equal basis, not constrained by the laws that had previou sly separated all those of Jewish heritage form all those of gentile birth. In other words, this is a message think for non-Jews. This point is raised now because it is necessary in order to remove social boundaries that could hamper Jesus mission to the Gentiles.4 The issue is not completely resolved, however, and commentators note that the position of Jews who became followers of Christ is left open, suggesting that go along observance of the dietary laws is an option for them.5 In the first part of the passage, Mark 71-14 the writer of the religious doctrine clearly is setting down a definitive teaching here which absolves Gentile followers from having to result the Jewish laws. The position for the disciples is further discussed in the remainder of the section, and in this case the message is taken to a different level. Some commentators suggest that the passage signifies a departure from the old Jewish laws the Markian Jesus declares that in fact all people are defiled not by what they eat and drink and by what they will say and do.6 This utterance signals a departure from the incident that pertained when God gave the law to the Jews, since, in the words of Boring it is not descriptive, but performative not explaining what has always been the case, but changing the situation by Jesus authoritative declaration.7 The distinction between purity and impurity is maintained, but the man-made lake of defilement is now defined in terms of what a person does, and not what kind of food for thought he or she eats. It opens the door for Jesus to go on and mingle with lepers, male and female Gentiles, and all kinds of sinners without fear of defilement in the traditional Jewish sense. When Jesus or his disciples are accused of defilement, he responds by dismissing these boundaries as